Replies

@kq This is such a good question. I do, but only sometimes, mostly read fresh as it arrives. Search is expected or at least fairly universal, and I’m happy using that, but also happy to find tags/categories to browse, especially when there is 'a lot' of material. They provide a map of sorts as to where the author would like to direct my attention, as others have observed above.

But on the other side, I don’t have enough there to need categories, and my use of them is very eccentric. Almost everything is tagged as 'information'. Oh. Okay! That helps, it’s info is it, on your internet? SO visitors can poke around the loose and lazy taxonomy, but lose nothing if they do not.

@pratik cuz it’s the agesim and sexism that are the problem, not the terms describing them. "Old hag" is still quite useful—and not only in ranch situations. 😉

@JohnPhilpin Right? I’ve been a cranky bastard recreationally for years, sometimes professionally, mostly to deal with the painful absurdities discovered trying to sort those sensitive in expression from those overly sensitive to sentiment. ❤︎ ★ ✖︎

@dejus develop your understanding of freedom by simply beholding his catness! ❤︎

Mastodon